last data update: 2011/10/21, 00:05

Website loading time

during the test: 0.57 s

cable connection (average): 0.78 s

DSL connection (average): 1 s

modem (average): 12.26 s

HTTP headers

Information about DNS servers

thecourt.caA130.63.74.241IN43200
thecourt.caSOAdns11.ipns.yorku.cahostmaster.yorku.ca3378646211200 180 1209600 3600 IN 21600
thecourt.caNSdns11.ipns.yorku.caIN21600
thecourt.caNSdns21.ipns.yorku.caIN21600
thecourt.caNShanna.cac.washington.eduIN21600

Received from the first DNS server

Request to the server "thecourt.ca"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: dns11.ipns.yorku.ca
DNS Server Address: 130.63.9.2#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 42054
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2

REQUEST SECTION:
thecourt.ca. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN SOA dns11.ipns.yorku.ca. hostmaster.yorku.ca. 337864621 1200 180 1209600 3600
thecourt.ca. 86400 IN A 130.63.74.241
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN NS hanna.cac.washington.edu.
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN NS dns21.ipns.yorku.ca.
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN NS dns11.ipns.yorku.ca.

SECTION NOTES:
dns11.ipns.yorku.ca. 21600 IN A 130.63.9.2
dns21.ipns.yorku.ca. 21600 IN A 130.63.10.2

Received 213 bytes from address 130.63.9.2#53 in 28 ms

Received from the second DNS server

Request to the server "thecourt.ca"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: dns21.ipns.yorku.ca
DNS Server Address: 130.63.10.2#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 4874
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2

REQUEST SECTION:
thecourt.ca. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN SOA dns11.ipns.yorku.ca. hostmaster.yorku.ca. 337864621 1200 180 1209600 3600
thecourt.ca. 86400 IN A 130.63.74.241
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN NS dns11.ipns.yorku.ca.
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN NS hanna.cac.washington.edu.
thecourt.ca. 21600 IN NS dns21.ipns.yorku.ca.

SECTION NOTES:
dns11.ipns.yorku.ca. 21600 IN A 130.63.9.2
dns21.ipns.yorku.ca. 21600 IN A 130.63.10.2

Received 213 bytes from address 130.63.10.2#53 in 28 ms

Subdomains (the first 50)

Typos (misspells)

rhecourt.ca
fhecourt.ca
ghecourt.ca
yhecourt.ca
6hecourt.ca
5hecourt.ca
tgecourt.ca
tbecourt.ca
tnecourt.ca
tjecourt.ca
tuecourt.ca
tyecourt.ca
thwcourt.ca
thscourt.ca
thdcourt.ca
thrcourt.ca
th4court.ca
th3court.ca
thexourt.ca
thevourt.ca
thefourt.ca
thedourt.ca
theciurt.ca
theckurt.ca
theclurt.ca
thecpurt.ca
thec0urt.ca
thec9urt.ca
thecoyrt.ca
thecohrt.ca
thecojrt.ca
thecoirt.ca
theco8rt.ca
theco7rt.ca
thecouet.ca
thecoudt.ca
thecouft.ca
thecoutt.ca
thecou5t.ca
thecou4t.ca
thecourr.ca
thecourf.ca
thecourg.ca
thecoury.ca
thecour6.ca
thecour5.ca
hecourt.ca
tecourt.ca
thcourt.ca
theourt.ca
thecurt.ca
thecort.ca
thecout.ca
thecour.ca
htecourt.ca
tehcourt.ca
thceourt.ca
theocurt.ca
thecuort.ca
thecorut.ca
thecoutr.ca
tthecourt.ca
thhecourt.ca
theecourt.ca
theccourt.ca
thecoourt.ca
thecouurt.ca
thecourrt.ca
thecourtt.ca

Location

IP: 130.63.74.241

continent: NA, country: Canada (CAN), city: Toronto

Website value

rank in the traffic statistics:

There is not enough data to estimate website value.

Basic information

website build using CSS

code weight: 81.86 KB

text per all code ratio: 4 %

title: The Court

description:

keywords:

encoding: UTF-8

language: en

Website code analysis

one word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
the8
v.8
of6
About5
Court5
in4
and3
Rights3
Judicial3
SCC3
Supreme3
on3

two word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
the SCC3
Supreme Court3

three word phrases repeated minimum three times

B tags

U tags

I tags

images

file namealternative text
2008 Canadian Law Blog Awards Winner
Creative Commons License

headers

H1

H2

Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. William Whatcott, et al. (2010), currently before the SCC

The Upshot of Up-Stream Losses in Mexico v. Cargill: Judicial Deference to International Arbitration Tribunals

Angevine v. Ontario: Judicial Appointment Promise Unenforceable

Much Confusion About Trade-mark Registration

Reneging on a Guilty Plea, Citing ADD

Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part III

What’s in a (Domain) Name? Ontario Courts, International Administrators, and Intangible Property in Tucows.Com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A.

Thought You Signed Your Rights Away? Seidel v. TELUS Proves You Wrong

Italian Seismologists to Stand Trial on Manslaughter Charges

Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part II

ADMIN

H3

Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. William Whatcott, et al. (2010), currently before the SCC

The Upshot of Up-Stream Losses in Mexico v. Cargill: Judicial Deference to International Arbitration Tribunals

Angevine v. Ontario: Judicial Appointment Promise Unenforceable

Much Confusion About Trade-mark Registration

Reneging on a Guilty Plea, Citing ADD

Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part III

What’s in a (Domain) Name? Ontario Courts, International Administrators, and Intangible Property in Tucows.Com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A.

Thought You Signed Your Rights Away? Seidel v. TELUS Proves You Wrong

Italian Seismologists to Stand Trial on Manslaughter Charges

Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part II

ADMIN

H4

H5

H6

internal links

addressanchor text
[-]
[+]
img
HOME
ABOUT
RESOURCES
ARCHIVES
LINKS
HELP
img
Subscribe
Respond
Contribute
Contact Us
img
About this website
About the staff
About our contributors
Dynamic Tools
Books & Monographs
Top Court Talk
Judges Timeline
Statistical Database
Table of Clerks
Snell & Vaughan, History of the SCC
Thaddeus Hwong, Judicial Decision Making in Tax Cases
Supreme Court Website
Supreme Court Judgments
Other Links
*
Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. William Whatcott, et al. (2010), currently before the SCC
The Upshot of Up-Stream Losses in Mexico v. Cargill: Judicial Deference to International Arbitration Tribunals
Angevine v. Ontario: Judicial Appointment Promise Unenforceable
Much Confusion About Trade-mark Registration
Reneging on a Guilty Plea, Citing ADD
Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part III
What’s in a (Domain) Name? Ontario Courts, International Administrators, and Intangible Property in Tucows.Com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A.
Thought You Signed Your Rights Away? Seidel v. TELUS Proves You Wrong
Italian Seismologists to Stand Trial on Manslaughter Charges
Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part II
Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. William Whatcott, et al. (2010), currently before the SCC"> Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. William Whatcott, et al. (2010), currently before the SCC
Katherine MacLellan
Read the rest of this entry
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Children
Constitutional law
Criminal justice
Freedom of Speech
Human rights
Whatcott (2007)
Respond
Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. William Whatcott, et al. (2010), currently before the SCC' on The Court at: http://www.thecourt.ca/2011/10/19/are-these-flyers-so-offensive-i-shouldnt-have-directed-your-attention-to-them-saskatchewan-human-rights-commission-v-william-whatcott-et-al-2010-currently-before-the-scc/" title="E-mail this item to a friend">Email the link
img
Mexico v. Cargill: Judicial Deference to International Arbitration Tribunals">The Upshot of Up-Stream Losses in Mexico v. Cargill: Judicial Deference to International Arbitration Tribunals
Marina Chernenko
Read the rest of this entry
Administrative law
Foreign claims
International law
Judicial review
Mexico v. Cargill (2011)
Respond
Mexico v. Cargill: Judicial Deference to International Arbitration Tribunals' on The Court at: http://www.thecourt.ca/2011/10/18/the-upshot-of-up-stream-losses-in-mexico-v-cargill-judicial-deference-to-international-arbitration-tribunals/" title="E-mail this item to a friend">Email the link
img
Angevine v. Ontario: Judicial Appointment Promise Unenforceable">Angevine v. Ontario: Judicial Appointment Promise Unenforceable
Joseph Marcus
Read the rest of this entry
Angevine v. Ontario (2011)
Blog Entry
Judges and courts
Respond
Angevine v. Ontario: Judicial Appointment Promise Unenforceable' on The Court at: http://www.thecourt.ca/2011/10/16/angevine-v-ontario-judicial-appointment-promise-found-unenforceable/" title="E-mail this item to a friend">Email the link
img
Much Confusion About Trade-mark Registration
Ivy Tsui
Read the rest of this entry
Evidence
Intellectual Property
Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles (2011)
Trade-marks
Respond
Email the link
img
Reneging on a Guilty Plea, Citing ADD
Lydia Guo
Read the rest of this entry
Blog Entry
Criminal justice
Criminal Procedure
U.S. Supreme Court
Respond
Email the link
img
Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part III
Christopher Hunter
I
II
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Constitutional law
Health Services (2007)
Labour relations
1 Response
Email the link
img
Tucows.Com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A.">What’s in a (Domain) Name? Ontario Courts, International Administrators, and Intangible Property in Tucows.Com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A.
Marina Chernenko
Read the rest of this entry
Civil Procedure
Intellectual Property
Internet
Property Law
Saulnier (2008)
Technology and the law
Tucows.com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A. (2011)
Van Breda (2010)
Respond
Tucows.Com Co. v. Lojas Renner S.A.' on The Court at: http://www.thecourt.ca/2011/10/04/what%e2%80%99s-in-a-domain-name-ontario-courts-international-administrators-and-intangible-property-in-tucows-com-co-v-lojas-renner-s-a/" title="E-mail this item to a friend">Email the link
img
Thought You Signed Your Rights Away? Seidel v. TELUS Proves You Wrong
Ivy Tsui
Read the rest of this entry
Blog Entry
Civil Procedure
Contracts
Seidel v. TELUS (2011)
Respond
Email the link
img
Italian Seismologists to Stand Trial on Manslaughter Charges
Joseph Marcus
Read the rest of this entry
Blog Entry
Criminal justice
1 Response
Email the link
img
Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part II
Christopher Hunter
Read the rest of this entry
Constitutional law
Health Services (2007)
Labour relations
Respond
Email the link
img
A List of Cases We Have Commented On
ScheduledHearings
Cases Awaiting Judgment
SCC News Releases
2009
2008
2007
2006
Black v. Breeden: The Ontario Court of Appeal Applies New Van Breda Test to Find Conrad Black Victorious
R. v. J.A.: An Uncomfortable Truth
Italian Seismologists to Stand Trial on Manslaughter Charges
“In-and-out” transactions: Creative Accounting or Election Fraud? The Conservative Party is Reprimanded at the Federal Court of Appeal
Defining the ‘Meaningful’ – Collective Bargaining and Freedom of Association (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser) Part III
Police Brutality Causes Stay of Proceedings in R. v. Tran
D.C. v. R. – HIV Criminalization Headed to the Supreme Court
“Privacy is Dead – Get Over It!”
Murphy v. Football Association Premier League: English Landlady Looks to Score Against Exclusive Sports Broadcasting
Quebec v. Nguyen: access to education in English, institutional completeness and the constitutionality of a sentence of the Charter of the French language, R.S.Q. c. C-11
About Top Court Talk
All Court Reports
img
Notes and Commentary
Responses
Edit
Log in

external links

addressanchor text
img
About Osgoode Hall Law School
Online Bibliography
Main Page
Page d'accueil
Information on Cases
News Releases (Lexum)
Lexum
CanLII
abortion
controversial flyers
will decide
Human Rights Code
Trade-marks Act
2011 SCC 27
Ontario (AG) v. Fraser
2011 ONCA 548
rule 17.02(a) of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure
2011 SCC 15
medieval-style attack on science
Ontario (AG) v. Fraser
Health Services
2008 Canadian Law Blog Awards Winner
img
ABlawg (University of Calgary Faculty of Law)
sLaw.ca
LEAP @ Windsor University
University of Toronto Law Faculty Blog
Michael Geist
Precedent
Supreme Court to consider case of newborn found in Walmart toilet
Supreme Court to hear murder-for-hire case
Supreme Court will hear case of woman who sought a hit man to kill spouse
FeedBlitz
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License