domstat.net

Website loading time

during the test: 1.53 s

cable connection (average): 1.67 s

DSL connection (average): 1.82 s

modem (average): 9.42 s

HTTP headers

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Connection: close

Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:16:09 GMT

Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0

X-Powered-By: ASP.NET

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727

Cache-Control: private

Expires: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:26:08 GMT

Vary: *

Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Content-Length: 56527

Information about DNS servers

Received from the first DNS server

Request to the server "studiougly.com"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns04.domaincontrol.com
DNS Server Address: 208.109.255.2#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 10212
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

REQUEST SECTION:
studiougly.com. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
studiougly.com. 86400 IN SOA ns03.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2009060200 28800 7200 604800 86400
studiougly.com. 3600 IN A 208.109.80.14
studiougly.com. 3600 IN NS ns03.domaincontrol.com.
studiougly.com. 3600 IN NS ns04.domaincontrol.com.
studiougly.com. 3600 IN MX 0 smtp.secureserver.net.
studiougly.com. 3600 IN MX 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.

Received 232 bytes from address 208.109.255.2#53 in 15 ms

Received from the second DNS server

Request to the server "studiougly.com"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns03.domaincontrol.com
DNS Server Address: 216.69.185.2#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 45160
flag: qr aa REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

REQUEST SECTION:
studiougly.com. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
studiougly.com. 86400 IN SOA ns03.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2009060200 28800 7200 604800 86400
studiougly.com. 3600 IN A 208.109.80.14
studiougly.com. 3600 IN NS ns03.domaincontrol.com.
studiougly.com. 3600 IN NS ns04.domaincontrol.com.
studiougly.com. 3600 IN MX 0 smtp.secureserver.net.
studiougly.com. 3600 IN MX 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.

Received 232 bytes from address 216.69.185.2#53 in 13 ms

Subdomains (the first 50)

Typos (misspells)

Location

IP: 208.109.80.14

continent: NA, country: United States (USA), city: Scottsdale

Website value

rank in the traffic statistics:

There is not enough data to estimate website value.

Basic information

website build using CSS

code weight: 55.2 KB

text per all code ratio: 18 %

title: STUDIO UGLY

description:

keywords:

encoding: UTF-8

language: en-US

Website code analysis

one word phrases repeated minimum three times

two word phrases repeated minimum three times

three word phrases repeated minimum three times

B tags

U tags

I tags

"David credits Pictage with helping photography "become a real industry run by professionals, rather than the old status quo, mom-and-pop type of operation"

He named his forum "Open Source Photo". He started OSP community in October of 2003 as a place for photographers to "share and learn from each other in a supportive and encouraging online environment"

"I have relied on word of mouth and word-of-mouse marketing."

He's turning the old model of "how photography works" on its head.

Sanders points out that he started meeting and networking with many talented shooters through his own early online interactions. As one of the first members of David Jay's Open Source Photo community, opensourcephoto.net, he singles out this resource as truly valuable. I met many other photographers and discovered that they too wanted to connect. I was Jay's overwhelmed friend who wanted to simplify my life and market my business."

"Nitorix rocks. I am proud to say I bought in with Forest. He is really gifted. Strong endorsement from me."

"When targeting consumers known to be consistent Internet users, undercover marketers have taken a significant interest in leveraging Internet chat rooms and forums. In these settings, people tend to perceive everyone as peers, the anonymity reduces the risk of being found out, and one marketer can personally influence a large number of people."

"If marketers fail to hide the campaign, they run considerable risk of backlash. In cases where consumers discover they have been manipulated into liking the product, they generally become angry at the marketer (and by association that product) over being misled."

images

headers

H1

H2

H3

H4

H5

H6

internal links

external links