last data update: 2011/10/14, 05:20

Website loading time

during the test: 0.5 s

cable connection (average): 0.7 s

DSL connection (average): 0.91 s

modem (average): 11.64 s

HTTP headers

Information about DNS servers

quickanded.comSOAns1.tigertech.netsupport.tigertech.net20110107027200 1800 604800 1800 IN 43200
quickanded.comA173.203.88.19IN1800
quickanded.comNSns2.tigertech.bizIN7200
quickanded.comNSns3.tigertech.orgIN7200
quickanded.comNSns1.tigertech.netIN7200

Received from the first DNS server

Request to the server "quickanded.com"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns2.tigertech.biz
DNS Server Address: 67.131.251.62#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 1263
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 3

REQUEST SECTION:
quickanded.com. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
quickanded.com. 1800 IN A 173.203.88.19
quickanded.com. 7200 IN NS ns1.tigertech.net.
quickanded.com. 7200 IN NS ns3.tigertech.org.
quickanded.com. 7200 IN NS ns2.tigertech.biz.
quickanded.com. 43200 IN SOA ns1.tigertech.net. support.tigertech.net. 2011010702 7200 1800 604800 1800

SECTION NOTES:
ns1.tigertech.net. 7200 IN A 208.80.4.61
ns2.tigertech.biz. 7200 IN A 67.131.251.62
ns3.tigertech.org. 7200 IN A 208.80.4.63

Received 233 bytes from address 67.131.251.62#53 in 74 ms

Received from the second DNS server

Request to the server "quickanded.com"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns3.tigertech.org
DNS Server Address: 208.80.4.63#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 31714
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 3

REQUEST SECTION:
quickanded.com. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
quickanded.com. 1800 IN A 173.203.88.19
quickanded.com. 7200 IN NS ns1.tigertech.net.
quickanded.com. 7200 IN NS ns3.tigertech.org.
quickanded.com. 7200 IN NS ns2.tigertech.biz.
quickanded.com. 43200 IN SOA ns1.tigertech.net. support.tigertech.net. 2011010702 7200 1800 604800 1800

SECTION NOTES:
ns1.tigertech.net. 7200 IN A 208.80.4.61
ns2.tigertech.biz. 7200 IN A 67.131.251.62
ns3.tigertech.org. 7200 IN A 208.80.4.63

Received 233 bytes from address 208.80.4.63#53 in 82 ms

Subdomains (the first 50)

Typos (misspells)

1uickanded.com
2uickanded.com
wuickanded.com
auickanded.com
qyickanded.com
qhickanded.com
qjickanded.com
qiickanded.com
q8ickanded.com
q7ickanded.com
quuckanded.com
qujckanded.com
qukckanded.com
quockanded.com
qu9ckanded.com
qu8ckanded.com
quixkanded.com
quivkanded.com
quifkanded.com
quidkanded.com
quicjanded.com
quicmanded.com
quiclanded.com
quicoanded.com
quicianded.com
quickznded.com
quicksnded.com
quickwnded.com
quickqnded.com
quickabded.com
quickamded.com
quickajded.com
quickahded.com
quickansed.com
quickanxed.com
quickanced.com
quickanfed.com
quickanred.com
quickaneed.com
quickandwd.com
quickandsd.com
quickanddd.com
quickandrd.com
quickand4d.com
quickand3d.com
quickandes.com
quickandex.com
quickandec.com
quickandef.com
quickander.com
quickandee.com
uickanded.com
qickanded.com
quckanded.com
quikanded.com
quicanded.com
quicknded.com
quickaded.com
quickaned.com
quickandd.com
quickande.com
uqickanded.com
qiuckanded.com
qucikanded.com
quikcanded.com
quicaknded.com
quicknaded.com
quickadned.com
quickanedd.com
quickandde.com
qquickanded.com
quuickanded.com
quiickanded.com
quicckanded.com
quickkanded.com
quickaanded.com
quickannded.com
quickandded.com
quickandeed.com
quickandedd.com

Location

IP: 173.203.88.19

continent: NA, country: United States (USA), city: San Antonio

Website value

rank in the traffic statistics: 714 388

There is not enough data to estimate website value.

Basic information

website build using CSS

code weight: 77.95 KB

text per all code ratio: 36 %

title: The Quick and the Ed — Published by Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington, D.C., The Quick and the Ed offers in-depth analysis on the latest in education policy and research.

description: Published by Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington, D.C., The Quick and the Ed offers in-depth analysis on the latest in education policy and research.

keywords:

encoding: UTF-8

language: en-US

Website code analysis

one word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
the181
of105
to101
and97
in61
on53
that48
for38
Education32
schools27
have25
is22
with21
are21
by21
be21
The21
201120
this20
as17
state17
or17
school17
October16
testing16
we16
costs16
it16
districts15
not15
what15
will15
from14
an13
201013
achievement13
but13
more13
200813
if13
Policy13
ESEA12
student12
would12
200912
200612
200712
Schools11
Quick11
about11
students11
they11
these10
Sector10
Share10
how10
than10
also10
their10
Testing9
just9
states9
could9
federal9
per9
out9
no8
Teacher8
In8
Ed8
Bill8
time8
other8
accountability8
bill8
For8
education7
its7
two7
budget7
Tucker7
high7
still7
Edujobs27
improve7
you7
all7
School7
Accountability7
Analyst7
policy7
Achievement7
only7
expenditures7
one7
NCLB6
Race6
January6
gaps6
College6
so6
can6
when6
June6
been6
Gap6
Hits6
July6
March6
May6
many6
American6
April6
February6
Uncategorized6
comments6
consequences6
Director6
assessment6
because6
This6
at6
August6
September6
State6
looked5
Aid5
assessments5
November5
December5
Foreign5
Low-Achieving5
additional5
As5
We5
There5
report5
Testing’s5
low5
was5
very5
education.5
Persistently5
Week5
money5
funds5
No5
less5
Child5
Left5
full5
Anne5
teacher5
save5
But5
has5
spent5
percent5
Read5
most5
last5
Standardized5
series5
up5
13,5
Senate5
same5
jobs5
analysis4
performance4
4
article4
Reauthorization4
figures4
used4
Tagged4
[...]4
as:4
like4
our4
Senator4
any4
here4
Work?4
While4
Hyslop4
(Part4
words4
Act4
12,4
Edujobs2:4
say4
which4
PLA4
Jobs4
Will4
spends4
over4
Quality4
found4
digital4
preparation4
such4
make4
must4
since4
Sen.4
part4
And4
district4
including4
few4
number4
foreign4
graduation4
identify4
whether4
much4
My4
vs.4
some4
standardized4
year4
years.4
AG4
testing,4
teachers4
statewide4
spend4
Waiver4
college3
good3
high-quality3
per-pupil3
spending3
see3
programs.3
Student3
words.3
were3
Behind3
Data3
data3
New3
York3
it’s3
first3
Harkin3
Tom3
why3
Mandy3
Zatynski3
year,3
Improvement3
Harkin’s3
her3
News3
after3
close3
Calculated3
school,3
If3
strategy3
3)3
years3
improvement3
How3
Managing3
more.3
under3
Top,3
three3
began3
get3
new3
learning3
talks3
do3
each3
California3
And,3
U.S.3
total3
different3
should3
time.3
however,3
even3
Thompson3
tests3
point3
states.3
testing.3
California,3
going3
focus3
After3
better3
there3
Explaining3
Harkin-Enzi3
Funding,3
layoffs3
research.3
independent3
think3
latest3
Stimulus3
Assessment3
instructional3
own3
plan,3
economy3
it,3
quality3
know3
groups3
they’re3
5%3
jobs,3
eliminated3
don’t3
small3
paper3
study3
Center3
related3
spending.3
Senior3
example,3
include3
easy3
way3

two word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
in the15
of the13
and the11
to the11
Education Sector10
on the8
Policy Analyst7
by the7
on October6
Achievement Gap6
Uncategorized Share6
2011 in6
Bill Tucker6
schools that6
Quick and6
that have6
The Quick6
not just6
Race to6
the federal6
Standardized Testing’s5
13, 20115
the American5
to improve5
consequences for5
to be5
from the5
of schools5
Foreign Aid5
Quick Hits5
Testing’s Foreign5
October 13,5
Persistently Low-Achieving5
Child Left5
the Ed5
achievement gaps5
No Child5
the same5
article →4
in Education4
full article4
the full4
districts and4
Teacher Quality4
Tagged as:4
Edujobs2: Will4
American Jobs4
Jobs Act4
Act Work?4
Will the4
as the4
Education Week4
of these4
of this4
out of4
Accountability Share4
costs of4
October 12,4
Read the4
such as4
of students4
in Uncategorized4
number of4
ESEA Reauthorization4
Anne Hyslop4
part of4
Work? (Part4
12, 20114
[...] Read4
percent of4
but also4
like the3
per student3
at the3
for the3
Tucker on3
We Calculated3
going to3
to identify3
words to3
Thompson on3
Left Behind3
the costs3
Schools to3
student achievement3
the first3
Mandy Zatynski3
have low3
Tom Harkin3
spent on3
for more3
State Testing3
testing costs3
Calculated State3
5% of3
How We3
on Standardized3
Managing Director3
districts will3
the Senate3
Explaining Edujobs2:3
Sen. Harkin’s3
of education.3
policy and3
the latest3
Harkin’s ESEA3
and schools3
of state3
and districts3
less than3
in this3
Gap Schools3
There are3
looked at3
the Top,3
when the3
of Education3
Center for3
with the3
education policy3
For example,3
by Education3
would have3
digital learning3

three word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
The Quick and6
Quick and the6
Race to the6
on October 13,5
Standardized Testing’s Foreign5
October 13, 20115
13, 2011 in5
Testing’s Foreign Aid5
and the Ed5
No Child Left5
the American Jobs4
American Jobs Act4
Will the American4
[...] Read the4
full article →4
the full article4
Edujobs2: Will the4
Read the full4
Jobs Act Work?4
October 12, 20114
in Uncategorized Share4
2011 in Uncategorized4
schools that have4
of schools that4
Act Work? (Part4
the costs of3
to the Top,3
Sen. Harkin’s ESEA3
Explaining Edujobs2: Will3
Child Left Behind3
Achievement Gap Schools3
Harkin’s ESEA Reauthorization3
5% of schools3
We Calculated State3
education policy and3
Calculated State Testing3
on the latest3
on Standardized Testing’s3
How We Calculated3

B tags

Smart

perspectives on

education policy and research

Learn more.

The Waiver Wire: A Few Surprises

Senator Harkin's ESEA Reauthorization Bill

What Ever Happened to No Child Left Behind?

A Portrait of School Improvement Grantees

U tags

I tags

9/23/11 | The American Independent

9/23/11 | State Impact

9/20/11 | Bill Tucker talks to MPR News

images

file namealternative text
States spend very little in per pupil terms on testing costs
Americans think the country spends much more on foreign aid than it does
California spends only $14 dollars per pupil on testing
Follow EducationSector on Twitter
Like Education Sector on Facebook
Subscribe to me on YouTube
Subscribe to our Podcasts
Follow EducationSector on Vimeo
WTOP
Inside Higher Ed
MPR News

headers

H1

H2

Harkin’s Achievement Gap Schools by the Numbers

Quick Hits (10.13.11)

How We Calculated State Testing Costs

Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 3)

Standardized Testing’s Foreign Aid Problem

Quick Hits (10.12.11)

The Waiver Wire: College-Ready Data “Progress”

Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 2)

Sen. Harkin’s ESEA Reauthorization Bill

Quick Hits (10.11.11)

H3

Harkin’s Achievement Gap Schools by the Numbers

Quick Hits (10.13.11)

How We Calculated State Testing Costs

Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 3)

Standardized Testing’s Foreign Aid Problem

Quick Hits (10.12.11)

The Waiver Wire: College-Ready Data “Progress”

Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 2)

Sen. Harkin’s ESEA Reauthorization Bill

Quick Hits (10.11.11)

H4

H5

H6

internal links

addressanchor text
The Quick and the Ed
Home
About
Podcasts
Harkin’s Achievement Gap Schools by the Numbers
Anne Hyslop
Accountability
synopsis here
Accountability Systems
Achievement Gaps
ESEA
ESEA Reauthorization
NCLB Reauthorization
School Accountability
School improvement
school turnaround
Senate HELP Committee
Senator Mike Enzi
Senator Tom Harkin
0 comments
Quick Hits (10.13.11)
Mandy Zatynski
Uncategorized
here
here
0 comments
How We Calculated State Testing Costs
Bill Tucker
Uncategorized
Assessment
Assessment Consortia
Open Platforms
Policy Dilemmas
Race to the Top
State Education Budgets
Stimulus Funding
Technology
Testing
2 comments
Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 3)
guest blogger
Uncategorized
1
2
track record
common target of layoffs
Part 1
ARRA Education Funds
Education Funding
Edujobs
Edujobs2
President Obama
Teacher Layoffs
0 comments
Standardized Testing’s Foreign Aid Problem
Bill Tucker
Accountability
California spends only $14 dollars per pupil on testing
>>See more here on how we calculated testing costs and related research.
Assessment
Assessment Consortia
Open Platforms
Policy Dilemmas
Race to the Top
State Education Budgets
Stimulus Funding
Technology
Testing
3 comments
Quick Hits (10.12.11)
Mandy Zatynski
Uncategorized
the good and the bad
participated in the second annual
1 comment
The Waiver Wire: College-Ready Data “Progress”
Accountability
Read the full article →
Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 2)
Uncategorized
Read the full article →
Sen. Harkin’s ESEA Reauthorization Bill
Accountability
Read the full article →
Quick Hits (10.11.11)
Uncategorized
Read the full article →
← Previous Entries
Learn more.
The Waiver Wire: A Few Surprises
Senator Harkin's ESEA Reauthorization Bill
What Ever Happened to No Child Left Behind?
Kristen Amundson
Gabriella Berman
Kevin Carey
Richard Lee Colvin
Rachel Fishman
Anne Hyslop
Amy Laitinen
Renee Rybak Lang
Sarah Rosenberg
Elena Silva
Bill Tucker
Mandy Zatynski
Accountability
Educational Choice
Teacher Quality
Undergraduate Education
Standardized Testing’s Foreign Aid Problem
How We Calculated State Testing Costs
How We Calculated State Testing Costs
Quick Hits (10.13.11)
Sen. Harkin’s ESEA Reauthorization Bill
Harkin’s Achievement Gap Schools by the Numbers
Sen. Harkin’s ESEA Reauthorization Bill
Standardized Testing’s Foreign Aid Problem
Standardized Testing’s Foreign Aid Problem
Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 3)
Explaining Edujobs2: Will the American Jobs Act Work? (Part 1)
Standardized Testing’s Foreign Aid Problem
Quick Hits (10.12.11)
Selling College Students Down the River
Assessment
Charter Schools
College Graduation Rates
DC Public Schools
For-Profit Colleges
Higher Education
Michelle Rhee
NAEP
NCLB
New York Times
No Child Left Behind
Quick Hits
Race to the Top
School Choice
Smarter Data Systems
Stimulus Funding
Student Data
Student Loans
Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Quality
Teachers Unions
Technology
U.S. Department of Education
Virtual Schools
WordPress Admin

external links

addressanchor text
A Publication of Education Sector
Subscribe
Share
most attention
hate it
okay with it
Harkin-Enzi bill
SIG program
Share
more than 10 percent achievement growth
here
thanks to the administration’s ESEA waiver plan
no longer offer remedial classes
this January policy brief
a new report
this policy brief
Share
Truth About Testing Costs
States spend very little in per pupil terms on testing costs
claims that funds spent on testing were a root cause of many district and state financial woes
2010 Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education study
2002 paper by Caroline Hoxby
2001 Education Commission of the States report
2006 Margins of Error report
Smarter/Balanced Race to the Top funding application
memo detailing budget cuts to the assessment program
Testing in Colorado: Time, Cost, and Purpose (2007)
2008 paper for the National Research Council
Share
Edujobs2 proposal
report
Government Accountability Office
independent estimates
projects
“funding cliff”
Share
Americans think the country spends much more on foreign aid than it does
Education Week
commentary in Education Week
bubble
Share
long-awaited proposal to overhaul
how little those assessments really cost
Hogwash
diverting better qualified teachers and technological resources
Follow EducationSector on Twitter
Subscribe to me on YouTube
Subscribe to our Podcasts
Follow EducationSector on Vimeo
A Portrait of School Improvement Grantees
Read This Report
WTOP
Inside Higher Ed
Bill Tucker
Crimson Wife
Brainstorm
Center for College Affordability and Productivity
College Guide
Core Knowledge
Early Ed Watch
EdIntercepts
Education Week Blogs
Eduoptimists
Eduwonk
Flypaper
GothamSchools
Hechinger Institute Blogs
Higher Ed Watch
Jay P. Greene
Linking and Thinking on Education
PIE Network Blog
Sherman Dorn
This Week in Education
Thesis WordPress Theme