last data update: 2011/10/14, 01:43

Website loading time

during the test: 0.1 s

cable connection (average): 0.35 s

DSL connection (average): 0.6 s

modem (average): 13.93 s

HTTP headers

Information about DNS servers

opiniojuris.orgSOAns1.mediatemple.netdnsadmin.mediatemple.net201107120110800 3600 1209600 43200 IN 43200
opiniojuris.orgMX10mail.opiniojuris.orgIN43200
opiniojuris.orgA64.207.155.139IN43200
opiniojuris.orgNSns1.mediatemple.netIN43200
opiniojuris.orgNSns2.mediatemple.netIN43200

Received from the first DNS server

Request to the server "opiniojuris.org"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns1.mediatemple.net
DNS Server Address: 64.207.128.246#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 55426
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 3

REQUEST SECTION:
opiniojuris.org. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN NS ns2.mediatemple.net.
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN NS ns1.mediatemple.net.
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN A 64.207.155.139
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN SOA ns1.mediatemple.net. dnsadmin.mediatemple.net. 2011071201 10800 3600 1209600 43200
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN MX 10 mail.opiniojuris.org.

SECTION NOTES:
ns2.mediatemple.net. 43200 IN A 70.32.65.137
ns1.mediatemple.net. 43200 IN A 64.207.128.246
mail.opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN A 64.207.155.139

Received 214 bytes from address 64.207.128.246#53 in 73 ms

Received from the second DNS server

Request to the server "opiniojuris.org"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns2.mediatemple.net
DNS Server Address: 70.32.65.137#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 3327
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 3

REQUEST SECTION:
opiniojuris.org. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN A 64.207.155.139
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN NS ns1.mediatemple.net.
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN MX 10 mail.opiniojuris.org.
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN NS ns2.mediatemple.net.
opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN SOA ns1.mediatemple.net. dnsadmin.mediatemple.net. 2011071201 10800 3600 1209600 43200

SECTION NOTES:
ns1.mediatemple.net. 43200 IN A 64.207.128.246
mail.opiniojuris.org. 43200 IN A 64.207.155.139
ns2.mediatemple.net. 43200 IN A 70.32.65.137

Received 214 bytes from address 70.32.65.137#53 in 13 ms

Subdomains (the first 50)

Typos (misspells)

ipiniojuris.org
kpiniojuris.org
lpiniojuris.org
ppiniojuris.org
0piniojuris.org
9piniojuris.org
ooiniojuris.org
oliniojuris.org
o-iniojuris.org
o0iniojuris.org
opuniojuris.org
opjniojuris.org
opkniojuris.org
oponiojuris.org
op9niojuris.org
op8niojuris.org
opibiojuris.org
opimiojuris.org
opijiojuris.org
opihiojuris.org
opinuojuris.org
opinjojuris.org
opinkojuris.org
opinoojuris.org
opin9ojuris.org
opin8ojuris.org
opiniijuris.org
opinikjuris.org
opiniljuris.org
opinipjuris.org
opini0juris.org
opini9juris.org
opiniohuris.org
opinionuris.org
opiniomuris.org
opiniokuris.org
opinioiuris.org
opiniouuris.org
opiniojyris.org
opiniojhris.org
opiniojjris.org
opiniojiris.org
opinioj8ris.org
opinioj7ris.org
opiniojueis.org
opiniojudis.org
opiniojufis.org
opiniojutis.org
opinioju5is.org
opinioju4is.org
opiniojurus.org
opiniojurjs.org
opiniojurks.org
opiniojuros.org
opiniojur9s.org
opiniojur8s.org
opiniojuria.org
opiniojuriz.org
opiniojurix.org
opiniojurid.org
opiniojurie.org
opiniojuriw.org
piniojuris.org
oiniojuris.org
opniojuris.org
opiiojuris.org
opinojuris.org
opinijuris.org
opiniouris.org
opiniojris.org
opiniojuis.org
opiniojurs.org
opiniojuri.org
poiniojuris.org
oipniojuris.org
opniiojuris.org
opiinojuris.org
opinoijuris.org
opinijouris.org
opinioujris.org
opiniojruis.org
opiniojuirs.org
opiniojursi.org
oopiniojuris.org
oppiniojuris.org
opiiniojuris.org
opinniojuris.org
opiniiojuris.org
opinioojuris.org
opiniojjuris.org
opiniojuuris.org
opiniojurris.org
opiniojuriis.org
opiniojuriss.org

Location

IP: 64.207.155.139

continent: NA, country: United States (USA), city: Culver City

Website value

rank in the traffic statistics: 938 256

There is not enough data to estimate website value.

Basic information

website build using CSS

code weight: 96.82 KB

text per all code ratio: 50 %

title: Opinio Juris

description:

keywords:

encoding: UTF-8

language: en

Website code analysis

one word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
the77
to55
of40
that34
is25
and20
we16
in16
future15
generations15
be14
for13
will13
have11
The11
not10
as9
Carbon9
our8
it8
Tax8
said7
an7
there7
It7
carbon7
on7
right6
do6
are6
has5
or5
by5
Australian5
you5
change5
per5
this5
can5
if5
from4
world4
their4
duty4
one4
only4
about4
In4
at4
present3
human3
natural3
environmental3
people3
face3
moral3
no3
up3
going3
most3
were3
live3
October3
legal3
such3
based3
environment3
interests3

two word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
future generations10
of the10
the Carbon8
Carbon Tax7
to the6
in the5
that we5
said that4
at the4
that the4
will be4
of future4
right to4
It is4
generations to3
it is3
duty to3
generations that3
on the3
world we3
In the3
Tax is3
the Australian3
there will3
face up3
up to3
going to3

three word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
the Carbon Tax7
of the Carbon4
face up to3
of future generations3

B tags

U tags

I tags

images

file namealternative text
Follow opiniojuris on Twitter
Find OpinioJuris on Facebook
Site Meter

headers

H1

H2

The Carbon Tax: A Victory for Future Generations?

China’s Security Council Diplomacy

Is Torture Always Wrong?

A Fair-Minded Non-American Legal Analysis of the Bin Laden Killing

Has Amnesty International Jumped the Shark?

Should the U.S. Offer Condolences for Drone Attacks?

A Response to Ramsey I

A Response to Kevin Heller (Part 2)

A Response to Kevin Heller on Doe v. Nestle

John Yoo Gives Partial Endorsement for Awlaki Memo

UCLA Law Forum on the ICC – Prevention Discussion Topic

How Lawyers are Ruining US CyberWar Defenses

H3

The Carbon Tax: A Victory for Future Generations?

China’s Security Council Diplomacy

Is Torture Always Wrong?

A Fair-Minded Non-American Legal Analysis of the Bin Laden Killing

Has Amnesty International Jumped the Shark?

Should the U.S. Offer Condolences for Drone Attacks?

A Response to Ramsey I

A Response to Kevin Heller (Part 2)

A Response to Kevin Heller on Doe v. Nestle

John Yoo Gives Partial Endorsement for Awlaki Memo

UCLA Law Forum on the ICC – Prevention Discussion Topic

How Lawyers are Ruining US CyberWar Defenses

H4

H5

H6

internal links

addressanchor text
img
Home
About
img
The Carbon Tax: A Victory for Future Generations?
No Comments
China’s Security Council Diplomacy
No Comments
Is Torture Always Wrong?
6 Comments
A Fair-Minded Non-American Legal Analysis of the Bin Laden Killing
No Comments
Has Amnesty International Jumped the Shark?
1 Comment
Should the U.S. Offer Condolences for Drone Attacks?
No Comments
A Response to Ramsey I
No Comments
A Response to Kevin Heller (Part 2)
prior post
noted
1 Comment
A Response to Kevin Heller on Doe v. Nestle
professors’ amicus brief in Doe v. Nestle USA, Inc.
7 Comments
John Yoo Gives Partial Endorsement for Awlaki Memo
6 Comments
UCLA Law Forum on the ICC – Prevention Discussion Topic
1 Comment
How Lawyers are Ruining US CyberWar Defenses
3 Comments
Chris Borgen
All Posts
Peggy McGuinness
All Posts
Julian Ku
All Posts
Roger Alford
All Posts
Kevin Jon Heller
All Posts
Duncan Hollis
All Posts
Peter Spiro
All Posts
Kenneth Anderson
All Posts
Deborah Pearlstein
All Posts
Glazier: More on Why the Al-Nashiri Charges Are Flawed
The United States' Radical Charges Against Al-Nashiri
The Fourth Circuit Joins the International Law Improv
The "Unwilling or Unable" Standard for Self-Defense
Criminal Membership's Lack of Precedential Value
Academic Symposia
Book Discussions
Law Review Partnerships
OUP/Opinio Juris Book Club
Opinio Juris Alumni
Register
Log in
Contact Opinio Juris

external links

addressanchor text
img
posted an interview between him and Joel Wuthnow
veto
short, accessible piece
other work on torture
EJIL Talk!
waterskis
Politico
legal opinions of folks like Mary Ellen O’Connell
story
Michael Rubin
according the the ICJ
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
thoughts
The forum can be found here
very powerful and clear explanation
trying to articulate
relies
are invoking
are apparently questioning whether
recently surrendered
recently adopted
complained publicly
img
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Website
SSRN
Follow opiniojuris on Twitter
Find OpinioJuris on Facebook
ACS Blog
Anupam Chander
ASIL Insights
Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports
CCJHR Blog
Concurring Opinions
Daniel Drezner
Democracy Arsenal
Discourse.net
ECHR Blog
EJIL: Talk!
Enough Said
EU Law Blog
FP Passport
How Appealing
ICC Observers
IJCentral
Instapundit
International Criminal Law Bureau
International Econ Law Blog
International Law Observer
International Law Reporter
IntLawGrrls
Investment Arbitration Reporter
Invisible College
Is That Legal?
Legal History Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Melbourne Journal of International Law
MountainRunner
PrawfsBlawg
Professor Brainbridge
SCOTUSblog
Talk Left
The Leiter Report
The Volokh Conspiracy
The Washington Note
Truth on the Market
UN Dispatch
VJIL
Wronging Rights
WSJ Law Blog
YJIL
Technorati Statistics