last data update: 2011/10/14, 21:28

Website loading time

during the test: 0.48 s

cable connection (average): 0.64 s

DSL connection (average): 0.79 s

modem (average): 9.09 s

HTTP headers

Information about DNS servers

folc.caA74.208.57.202IN10800
folc.caSOAns51.1and1.comhostmaster.1and1.com200711040228800 7200 604800 86400 IN 43200
folc.caMX10mx01.1and1.comIN43200
folc.caMX10mx00.1and1.comIN43200
folc.caNSns52.1and1.comIN43200
folc.caNSns51.1and1.comIN43200

Received from the first DNS server

Request to the server "folc.ca"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns52.1and1.com
DNS Server Address: 217.160.81.164#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 11179
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

REQUEST SECTION:
folc.ca. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
folc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns52.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN MX 10 mx01.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN MX 10 mx00.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns51.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN SOA ns51.1and1.com. hostmaster.1and1.com. 2007110402 28800 7200 604800 86400
folc.ca. 10800 IN A 74.208.57.202

Received 177 bytes from address 217.160.81.164#53 in 67 ms

Received from the second DNS server

Request to the server "folc.ca"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns51.1and1.com
DNS Server Address: 217.160.80.164#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 38511
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

REQUEST SECTION:
folc.ca. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
folc.ca. 10800 IN A 74.208.57.202
folc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns51.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns52.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN MX 10 mx01.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN MX 10 mx00.1and1.com.
folc.ca. 86400 IN SOA ns51.1and1.com. hostmaster.1and1.com. 2007110402 28800 7200 604800 86400

Received 177 bytes from address 217.160.80.164#53 in 68 ms

Subdomains (the first 50)

Typos (misspells)

dolc.ca
colc.ca
volc.ca
golc.ca
tolc.ca
rolc.ca
filc.ca
fklc.ca
fllc.ca
fplc.ca
f0lc.ca
f9lc.ca
fokc.ca
fopc.ca
fooc.ca
folx.ca
folv.ca
folf.ca
fold.ca
olc.ca
flc.ca
foc.ca
fol.ca
oflc.ca
floc.ca
focl.ca
ffolc.ca
foolc.ca
follc.ca
folcc.ca

Location

IP: 74.208.57.202

continent: NA, country: United States (USA), city: Wayne

Website value

rank in the traffic statistics:

There is not enough data to estimate website value.

Basic information

website build using CSS

code weight: 60.27 KB

text per all code ratio: 36 %

title: Home Page of FOLC

description: This is the website of FOLC, The Friends of Lamont County for Responsible Industrial and Community Development

keywords: account, affecting, agricultural, Alberta, areas, associated, association, attracting, available, Board, booming, boundary, Bruderheim, businesses, Canada, Category, cesspool, children, City, combination, community, concerned, condition, Conservation, county, derailments, developments, Directors, donations, downwind, dumping, east, Environmental, Evacuations, events, expensive, explore, facility, families, Fathers, fertilizer, finances, Fires, FOLC, Fort, Friends, Government, grandchildren, grow, handling, HAZCO, health, Impact, industrial, industry, Issues, Lamont, liabilities, Life, live, members, methods, miles, mishaps, monitor, Natural, News, not-for-profit, oil-sands, opposed, organization, owners, plants, plastic, Poisoning, prevent, producers, program, properties, proposed, provided, rate, refineries, residents, Resources, Responsible, revenue, risk, Saskatchewan, Schneider, site, society, source, Statements, storage, storing, Strathcona, Sulphur, table, Taxes, threats, Train, upgraders, Walter, wastes, Weather, website, Welcome

encoding: windows-1252

language: en-us

Website code analysis

one word phrases repeated minimum three times

two word phrases repeated minimum three times

three word phrases repeated minimum three times

B tags

Hot topics:

FOLC is not opposed

folc.ca

Alberta Government -

U tags

I tags

not opposed

folc.ca

images

file namealternative text
Logo: folc.ca: For our Lamont County
Click to get your own widget
Quantcast
Living in the Shadow of Industry
bullet

headers

H1

H2

H3

H4

Bitumen Upgrader

Heavy Metals

Links Page

Taxes

Weather

H5

H6

internal links

addressanchor text
Home
In The News
Contact Us
Our Blog
Search this Website
Visible Air Pollution
Maxim Index
News on Maxim
News on NAOSC
News on HAZCO
Environmental Impact of Sulphur
Sulphur Poisoning
Sulphur Fires
Site Map
Air Quality, Flaring and Monitoring
Links
References - Bibliography
Visit LCE
Table of Contents
How to navigate this website
About FOLC
Directors
The left navigation bar
The table of contents
Air Pollution by the Industrial Heartland
Alberta Environment
Bitumen Upgrader
Health Impact of Sulphur
Heavy Metals
Industrial Heartland
Links Page
News, Happenings and Events
Petroleum-Coke
Sulphur-Train_Derailments
Sulphur Fires
Sulphur Poisoning
Taxes
Weather and Sulphur
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting
Flaring at Fort Saskatchewan
FOLC News
Home Page of FOLC
Missing Air-Monitoring Data — FAP Response
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document
Visible Air Pollution in the Industrial Heartland of Alberta and Vicinity
News Release 2006 04 21: Bruderheim Sulphur Plant
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility
Notice of decision by Alberta Environment re: HAZCO's (in The Lamont Leader, Dec 6, 2005)
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?
What have you done to keep area residents informed about your proposal?
What is your proposed schedule for approvals, construction and completion?
News Release 2006 04 21: Bruderheim Sulphur Plant
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility
Bibliography
FOLC News
Home Page of FOLC
How much more rail and truck traffic can residents expect when your project is up and running?
Index Page for HAZCO Issues
NAOSC bitumen upgrader
NAOSC's proposed oil-sand oil upgrader west of Bruderheim
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document
Sulphur -- waste by-product of mining, oil-refining and energy production
Sulphur Fires
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray
What do you do with the sulphur once it arrives?
Contact FOLC
Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum
How dangerous are the health risks if there is a sulphur fire?
How willing would you be to live near this facility?
News Release 2006 04 21: Bruderheim Sulphur Plant
Notice of decision by Alberta Environment re: HAZCO's (in The Lamont Leader, Dec 6, 2005)
Opponents to your project claim that the technology you’re using to store the sulphur is new and untested?
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary
Sulphur Fires
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare
Sulphur prills render environmental pollution by sulphur harmless?
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards
Sulphur: block-storage, processing and loading at Shell's Shantz Sulphur Facility
The flyer asks “Will our quality of life survive Hazco’s Sulphur Storage facility.
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision
The start of the opposition to HAZCO's proposal
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray
What assurances can you give residents that this technology will actually work, especially on the long term?
What exactly are you proposing to build?
What guarantees can you give that this project won’t have a negative impact on water quality, especially runoff?
What guarantees can you give that your project won’t have negative impact on air quality, especially dust and particulates?
What is your proposed schedule for approvals, construction and completion?
What would you do about the stink of burning sulphur?
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting
How willing would you be to live near this facility?
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary
Sulphur Fires
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?
What assurances can you give residents that this technology will actually work, especially on the long term?
Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum
How dangerous are the health risks if there is a sulphur fire?
How willing would you be to live near this facility?
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards
The flyer asks “Will our quality of life survive Hazco’s Sulphur Storage facility.
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray
Home Page of FOLC
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document
Sulphur -- waste by-product of mining, oil-refining and energy production
Bibliography
Correspondence to and from County Office
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum
Home Page of FOLC
How much more rail and truck traffic can residents expect when your project is up and running?
How significant will this project be to the local tax base?
How would you like it if you looked out your window and all you saw was a sulphur storage facility?
Industrial Heartland expansion in Lamont County -- Questions & Answers
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility
Proposal for a Cancerous Expansion of the Lamont-County-Portion of the Industrial Heartland
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare
The latest and archived news on HAZCO Sulphur
Visible Air Pollution in the Industrial Heartland of Alberta and Vicinity
Bibliography
Links Page
Attempt at launching communications committee
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta
FOLC News
Index Page for HAZCO Issues
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare
FOLC News
Home Page of FOLC
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray
Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary
Sulphur Fires
Sulphur prills render environmental pollution by sulphur harmless?
Sulphur Train Derailments in Canada and the world
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray
Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting
How dangerous are the health risks if there is a sulphur fire?
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary
Sulphur Fires
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare
Sulphur Train Derailments in Canada and the world
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision
The start of the opposition to HAZCO's proposal
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?
What would you do about the stink of burning sulphur?
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum
Sulphur Poisoning
Sulphur prills render environmental pollution by sulphur harmless?
Comments on HAZCO's answers to its FAQs- Index Page
FOLC News
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum
Home Page of FOLC
How many people will be required to build the facility and how many of those will be local?
How much more rail and truck traffic can residents expect when your project is up and running?
How much will it cost?
How significant will this project be to the local tax base?
How will you deal with the safety issues with so much more road and rail traffic?
How would you like it if you looked out your window and all you saw was a sulphur storage facility?
Index Page for HAZCO Issues
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility
Proposal for a Cancerous Expansion of the Lamont-County-Portion of the Industrial Heartland
The flyer maintains that the storage facility is a waste of prime industrial land with very little tax return.
The start of the opposition to HAZCO's proposal
What impact do you think your facility will have on attracting other industrial developments in the community?
Why is this a good area to build your facility? What makes this better than somewhere more remote?
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum
Missing Air-Monitoring Data — FAP Response
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare
Disclaimer
Copyright information
Contact

external links

addressanchor text
Share
Quantcast
Share