last data update: 2011/10/15, 18:05

Website loading time

during the test: 1.46 s

cable connection (average): 1.67 s

DSL connection (average): 1.88 s

modem (average): 13.06 s

HTTP headers

Information about DNS servers

crunchnotes.comA98.129.229.142IN3600
crunchnotes.comMX10mx1.emailsrvr.comIN3600
crunchnotes.comMX20mx2.emailsrvr.comIN3600
crunchnotes.comSOAdns1.stabletransit.comipadmin.stabletransit.com12900400563600 300 1814400 300 IN 3600
crunchnotes.comNSdns2.stabletransit.comIN3600
crunchnotes.comNSdns1.stabletransit.comIN3600

Received from the first DNS server

Request to the server "crunchnotes.com"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: dns2.stabletransit.com
DNS Server Address: 65.61.188.4#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 41521
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2

REQUEST SECTION:
crunchnotes.com. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN SOA dns1.stabletransit.com. ipadmin.stabletransit.com. 1290040056 3600 300 1814400 300
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN MX 10 mx1.emailsrvr.com.
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN MX 20 mx2.emailsrvr.com.
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN NS dns1.stabletransit.com.
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN NS dns2.stabletransit.com.
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN A 98.129.229.142

SECTION NOTES:
dns1.stabletransit.com. 300 IN A 69.20.95.4
dns2.stabletransit.com. 300 IN A 65.61.188.4

Received 227 bytes from address 65.61.188.4#53 in 14 ms

Received from the second DNS server

Request to the server "crunchnotes.com"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: dns1.stabletransit.com
DNS Server Address: 69.20.95.4#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 27389
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

REQUEST SECTION:
crunchnotes.com. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN SOA dns1.stabletransit.com.crunchnotes.com. ipadmin.stabletransit.com.crunchnotes.com. 1290040056 3600 300 1814400 300
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN A 98.129.229.142
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN MX 20 mx2.emailsrvr.com.
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN MX 10 mx1.emailsrvr.com.
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN NS dns2.stabletransit.com.
crunchnotes.com. 3600 IN NS dns1.stabletransit.com.

Received 218 bytes from address 69.20.95.4#53 in 14 ms

Subdomains (the first 50)

Typos (misspells)

xrunchnotes.com
vrunchnotes.com
frunchnotes.com
drunchnotes.com
ceunchnotes.com
cdunchnotes.com
cfunchnotes.com
ctunchnotes.com
c5unchnotes.com
c4unchnotes.com
crynchnotes.com
crhnchnotes.com
crjnchnotes.com
crinchnotes.com
cr8nchnotes.com
cr7nchnotes.com
crubchnotes.com
crumchnotes.com
crujchnotes.com
cruhchnotes.com
crunxhnotes.com
crunvhnotes.com
crunfhnotes.com
crundhnotes.com
cruncgnotes.com
cruncbnotes.com
cruncnnotes.com
cruncjnotes.com
cruncunotes.com
cruncynotes.com
crunchbotes.com
crunchmotes.com
crunchjotes.com
crunchhotes.com
crunchnites.com
crunchnktes.com
crunchnltes.com
crunchnptes.com
crunchn0tes.com
crunchn9tes.com
crunchnores.com
crunchnofes.com
crunchnoges.com
crunchnoyes.com
crunchno6es.com
crunchno5es.com
crunchnotws.com
crunchnotss.com
crunchnotds.com
crunchnotrs.com
crunchnot4s.com
crunchnot3s.com
crunchnotea.com
crunchnotez.com
crunchnotex.com
crunchnoted.com
crunchnotee.com
crunchnotew.com
runchnotes.com
cunchnotes.com
crnchnotes.com
cruchnotes.com
crunhnotes.com
cruncnotes.com
crunchotes.com
crunchntes.com
crunchnoes.com
crunchnots.com
crunchnote.com
rcunchnotes.com
curnchnotes.com
crnuchnotes.com
crucnhnotes.com
crunhcnotes.com
cruncnhotes.com
crunchontes.com
crunchntoes.com
crunchnoets.com
crunchnotse.com
ccrunchnotes.com
crrunchnotes.com
cruunchnotes.com
crunnchnotes.com
cruncchnotes.com
crunchhnotes.com
crunchnnotes.com
crunchnootes.com
crunchnottes.com
crunchnotees.com
crunchnotess.com

Location

IP: 98.129.229.142

continent: NA, country: United States (USA), city: San Antonio

Website value

rank in the traffic statistics:

There is not enough data to estimate website value.

Basic information

website build using CSS

code weight: 81.21 KB

text per all code ratio: 75 %

title: CrunchNotes

description:

keywords:

encoding: UTF-8

language: en-US

Website code analysis

one word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
the398
to360
and266
of220
in167
that149
you146
is109
on88
for85
your76
have74
this65
was63
he61
it60
our55
not54
with50
be49
his49
Sam49
as47
or47
about45
from45
by44
Sethi43
me41
are41
we39
TechCrunch38
my37
client36
at36
had36
has32
would32
any31
The30
Mr.30
just29
but29
all29
up27
will27
him27
post26
people26
Arrington25
what25
been25
24
no23
which23
against22
also22
an22
In21
were20
get20
other19
libel19
letter19
out19
who19
December18
more18
then18
even17
when17
If17
As16
take16
Blognation16
they16
did16
if16
UK16
made15
time15
said15
But15
This15
so15
may15
former15
these15
200714
very14
200914
courts14
jurisdiction14
do14
It14
can14
written13
some13
He13
know13
over13
because12
statements12
one12
case12
than12
email12
where12
those12
it.11
And11
now11
legal11
think11
should11
editors11
make11
You11
Michael11
claims10
back10
blog10
there10
claim10
how10
still10
things10
them10
lies,10
posts10
Oliver10
first10
into10
Mike10
before10
such10
last9
you’ve9
done9
someone9
funding9
please9
give9
paid9
here9
like9
threatened9
being9
pay9
never9
business9
same9
open9
you,9
TechCrunch,9
don’t9
writing9
I’m9
least9
write9
didn’t9
We9
actually8
fraud8
judgment8
say8
show8
nothing8
could8
its8
since8
hurt8
let8
making8
serious8
U.S.8
published8
[sic]8
care8
read8
English8
They7
Our7
whole7
Comments7
client’s7
friends7
right7
criminal7
What7
posted7
put7
law7
Loren7
publication7
come7
judgement7
help7
good7
only7
United7
Jones7
August7
lawyer7
own7
many7
months7
their7
I’m6
truth6
without6
way6
damages6
fucking6
another6
too6
sue6
stop6
again6
litigation6
took6
name6
it’s6
am6
blognation6
aware6
chance6
that,6
after6
Starr6
both6
few6
off6
see6
Mr6
(and6
response6
pretty6
doesn’t6
Debi6
end6
default6
Sethi’s6
court6
why6
lawsuit6
year6
can’t6
Marc6
two6
February6
while6
letter,6
within6
four6
Lee6
Internet5
words5
history5
responsible5
it’s5
wanted5
post,5
told5
US5
November5
support5
passed5
thing5
clear5
hope5
filed5
Buddy5
between5
really5
titled5
week5
5,5
already5
jurisdiction.5
following5
For5
threat5
Dear5
posting5
allegations5
Sethi,5
asked5
previous5
yet5
California5
most5
Blognation.5
Paul5
simply5
emails5
reply5
attack5
March5
sure5
us5
much5
kill5
It’s5
TechCrunch.5
Your5
away5
writers5
wish5
forum5
saying5
Sam.5
tell5
listed5
true5
until5
long5
given5
whether5
submit5
money5
understand5
That5
On5
which,4
Sam,4
death4
needs4
suit4
comments4
heart4
damage4
charity4
new4
Court4
High4
drunk4
here,4
defend4
19,4
won’t4
I’ve4
Re:4
came4
and/or4
involved4
UK,4
decided4
through4
Foo4
know,4
seeks4
complete4
standards4
sent4
attempts4
editor4
previously4
later4
agreed4
that’s4
set4
you.4
makes4
writes4
weeks4
every4
ago4
Sincerely,4
termsheet4
email,4
haven’t4
say,4
made.4
kind4
basis4
Every4
detail4
dispute4
state4
factual4
lost4
going4
statement4
once4
order4
wrote4
person4
threats4
dog4
Many4
concerning4
costs4
ever4
letters4
great4
reason4
there’s4
real4
event4
admitting4
pathological4
psychotic4
perhaps4
antisocial4
publish4
Sethi’s4
went4
There4
thought4
want4
content4
heard4
around4
find4
So4
More4
accused4
need4
wouldn’t4
well,4
judgments4
others4
employees4
remedies4
years4
entitled:4
lot4
couldn’t4
go4
look4
clearly4
isn’t4
further4
All4
fees4
probably4
said,4
conference4
days4
brought3
themselves3
firm3
“The3
Wilkins,3
well3
full3
Launches3
big3
web3
move3
seriously3
ago,3
bank3
represents3
finally3
Le3
later.3
July3
ridiculous3
publicly.3
choose3
today3
himself3
anyone3
says3
myself3
taken3
submitting3
exchange3
lab3
despicable3
spin3
place3
“Sam3
having3
Other3
(not3
above.3
true.3
behavior”3
posts.3
My3
bitter3
him,3
them.3
event.3
kill”3
October3
stupid3
fight3
v.3
working3
appears3
got3
advice3
nonsense.3
that.3
up,3
therefore3
future.3
use3
here.3
company3
nasty3
actions3
matter3
Europe3
New3
rest3
Blog3
lied3
recognize3
honestly3
That’s3
site3
man3
me,3
evidence3
technology3
mistakes3
situation3
2007,3
yours3
there;3
litany3
ugly3
“So…3
setting3
exaggerations,3
manipulation,3
usury,3
fact3
evasiveness,3
Ms.3
attend3
due3
At3
“I3
travel3
appropriate3
arrington3
expect3
Starr,3
State3
worse.3
list3
That’s3
proper3
TechCrunch:3
completely3
life3
head3
(see3
6,3
achieve3
various3
points3
far3
CrunchBase3
accusations3
mind3
towards3
friend.3
laws3
morally3
letter.3
you’ll3
coming3
To3
you’re3
up.3
Camp3
public3
decent3
subject3
add3
start3
employee3
know.3
next3
late3
From3
speech3
June3
Orchant3
something3
else3
confidential3
California.3
anything3
including3
ethically3
always3
law,3
gave3
client!s3
decide3
183
Of3
on.3
Arrington,3
likely3
lying3
book3
trying3
wasn’t3
offer3
leave3
unpaid3
heated3
personal3
behaviour3
we’d3
Blognation,3
didn’t3
guy3
England3
him.3
happy3
feel3
past3
little3
May3
foreign3
number3
left3
reserve3
couple3
provide3
emailed3
event,3
linked3
[redacted]3
susceptible3
fully3
day3
Wales,3
background3
Then3
knows3
culpable3
About3
resulting3

two word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
in the52
of the33
to the26
our client21
on the16
for the16
that you15
your client15
Sam Sethi14
you have14
to be13
in your12
have been10
and the10
is not10
that he10
the UK10
jurisdiction of9
the same9
out of9
of this8
that the8
this is8
about the8
If you8
the jurisdiction8
that our8
by Mike7
me and7
we have7
to take7
in this7
would be7
Comments by7
you are7
from the7
Mike on7
you and7
he has7
at least7
letter to7
of those7
at the7
that your7
you in6
in his6
the case6
more lies,6
Mr. Sethi6
you to6
post on6
that what6
TechCrunch and6
of any6
with the6
to do6
he was6
of his6
is that6
not just6
Sethi has6
As you5
did not5
there is5
of your5
of our5
have to5
the Internet5
and then5
for your5
wish to5
Arrington and5
right to5
done is5
will be5
has been5
listed in5
it is5
more than5
That you5
to give5
the United5
up to5
your February5
to me5
the first5
to your5
pathological and4
even psychotic4
between you4
former business4
Debi Jones4
read the4
as the4
antisocial –4
– perhaps4
and antisocial4
and you4
to pay4
good chance4
and so4
December 20074
It was4
would have4
you had4
on TechCrunch,4
chance that4
by you4
actually criminal4
criminal not4
client may4
is actually4
and that4
that we4
just pathological4
19, 20094
former writers4
want to4
TechCrunch is4
Mr. Sethi’s4
me to4
responsible for4
the US4
of Mr.4
your client’s4
said that4
that Mr.4
didn’t show4
the truth4
is the4
on August4
High Court4
Court of4
judgment against4
Michael Arrington4
This is4
the people4
kind of4
write about4
It is4
decided to4
In December4
February 19,4
threat to4
of these4
in which4
all of4
As we4
that are4
English courts4
but you4
to you,4
perhaps even4
Oliver Starr4
Sam Sethi,4
on our4
have no4
be paid4
to our4
this post4
to put4
as we4
would not4
open letter4
you’ve done4
to say,4
the courts4
to Sam4
UK courts4
to sue4
of which4
threatened to4
to kill4
some of4
to submit4
name of3
Sethi filed3
all the3
2007 post3
to tell3
will not3
Marc Orchant3
you claim3
against TechCrunch3
about Sam3
going to3
posted the3
jurisdiction over3
the name3
claim that3
are very3
spin and3
State of3
the State3
accused him3
can be3
in my3
be the3
claims would3
and it3
friends of3
forum for3
has the3
client’s claims3
him and3
that it3
against our3
about it3
my lawyer3
lawyer to3
need to3
our March3
our client’s3
like to3
You have3
Foo Camp3
you were3
to make3
his post3
reserve our3
not have3
culpable threat3
in December3
and has3
to this3
he would3
of you3
not be3
of my3
way to3
of him3
Many of3
of people3
me look3
or the3
and other3
the UK,3
his first3
was in3
the proper3
libel suit3
rest of3
it would3
to achieve3
5, 20073
let me3
of them3
the damage3
such as3
our right3
by the3
number of3
and said3
written about3
that have3
it to3
when he3
this case3
your letter3
susceptible to3
aware that3
and to3
There are3
basis of3
you know3
English libel3
years and3
that people3
libel judgment3
and our3
not to3
one of3
the most3
aware of3
him of3
there’s good3
the allegations3
his own3
needs to3
what you’ve3
firm represents3
think there’s3
Dear Mr.3
Sam think3
honestly Sam3
Re: TechCrunch:3
TechCrunch: Sam3
Sethi Dear3
had no3
Mr. Sethi’s3
trying to3
Lee Wilkins,3
to kill”3
and also3
time to3
four months3
the High3
his mind3
foreign libel3
then why3
not susceptible3
client was3
– honestly3
even –3
“So… that’s3
up with3
that’s pretty3
pretty ugly3
ugly litany3
Arrington is3
tell you3
an email3
who had3
where the3
post in3
subject to3
litany of3
of yours3
evasiveness, manipulation,3
exaggerations, evasiveness,3
manipulation, usury,3
usury, fraud3
fraud even3
lies, exaggerations,3
still more3
up there;3
yours up3
there; lies,3
lies, more3
lies, still3
following the3
psychotic behavior”3
Sam to3
client is3
out to3
our client!s3
couple of3
and would3
in our3
of Sam3
set out3
the editors3
the other3
wanted to3
of English3
we are3
of Marc3
give him3
courts in3
Mr. Arrington3
heart attack3
and if3
concerning the3
may be3
is true3
Sethi is3
to understand3
the court3
if you3
have accused3
you can3
to read3
March 183
this letter3
attempts to3

three word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
the jurisdiction of8
Comments by Mike7
that our client7
by Mike on7
jurisdiction of the6
that your client6
listed in your5
to the jurisdiction5
just pathological and4
not just pathological4
criminal not just4
pathological and antisocial4
and antisocial –4
– perhaps even4
actually criminal not4
antisocial – perhaps4
in the United4
between you and4
February 19, 20094
your February 19,4
good chance that4
in your February4
done is actually4
chance that what4
perhaps even psychotic4
is actually criminal4
High Court of4
right to sue4
Mike on August4
evasiveness, manipulation, usury,3
have accused him3
accused him of3
manipulation, usury, fraud3
exaggerations, evasiveness, manipulation,3
TechCrunch: Sam Sethi3
even – honestly3
fraud even –3
Sam Sethi Dear3
TechCrunch is not3
usury, fraud even3
not susceptible to3
forum for your3
for your client’s3
your client’s claims3
client’s claims would3
more lies, still3
lies, still more3
– honestly Sam3
susceptible to the3
more lies, exaggerations,3
still more lies,3
is not susceptible3
Sam think there’s3
open letter to3
the High Court3
claims would be3
wish to submit3
our client was3
the name of3
your client may3
even psychotic behavior”3
English libel judgment3
responsible for the3
libel judgment against3
Re: TechCrunch: Sam3
there’s good chance3
think there’s good3
the UK courts3
honestly Sam think3
our right to3
reserve our right3
letter to Sam3
you’ve done is3
what you’ve done3
that what you’ve3
jurisdiction of English3
lies, exaggerations, evasiveness,3
pretty ugly litany3
ugly litany of3
litany of yours3
of yours up3
of Mr. Sethi’s3
in the UK,3
culpable threat to3
in the UK3
“So… that’s pretty3
that’s pretty ugly3
yours up there;3
would be the3
up there; lies,3
in the US3
be the State3
there; lies, more3
the State of3
lies, more lies,3

B tags

U tags

I tags

images

file namealternative text
crunchnotes logo
Screen shot 2010-01-06 at 1.03.48 AM
MediaTemple Logo
QuickSprout Logo
OpenX Logo
Cotendo Logo
Quantcast

headers

H1

H2

H3

H4

H5

H6

internal links

addressanchor text
CrunchNotes
More
crunchnotes logo
About
Archives
A Day In Our Lives At TechCrunch
2 Comments
Mike
Choosing between Buddy and a buddy.
9 Comments
Mike
Foo Camp 2009
5 Comments
Mike
Paul Carr: An open letter to Sam Sethi, on the occasion of him completely losing his mind
15 Comments
Mike
Sam Sethi
here
here
here
Enterprise Hacks Opining On The Law, And Other Blogging Tragedies
20 Comments
Mike
reasoned low key approach
complete history of Sam Sethi is all in detail here
reiterated
letters back to Sethi’s attorney
Update On Sam Sethi Litigation: We Decline To Participate
61 Comments
Mike
June post
Sam Sethi
lied to and cheated
Sam Sethi: The Lawsuit
29 Comments
Mike
complete history
Older Entries
About
Archives

external links

addressanchor text
Tech
Gadgets
Mobile
Enterprise
CrunchBase
Beta Invites
Crunchies
Elevator Pitches
Gillmor Gang
Podcasts
TechCrunch50
TechCrunch Europe
TechCrunch France
TechCrunch Japan
Twitter
CrunchBar
Email
RSS
See this one for example
Audience Conference
Buddy
ecording his side of the conversation
this lab rescue organization is amazing
Foo Camp
Foo Camp 2008
created
new video product
CrunchBase Information
Animoto
CrunchBase
read this post
by me
writing
charity
Twittered
comments
his post
negative
writes
Laws have been passed
winning
London FOWA
YouTube
Marvel
Rivals
Mediascrape
EarthComber
Richard Figueroa
http://owstarr.com/2007/12/05/an-open-letter-to-sam-sethi/
http://redcouch.typepad.com/weblog/2007/12/sam-sethi-repl.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2007/dec/05/isblognationfallingapart
http://rulabula.blogspot.com/2007/12/sethi-fraud-was-all-mike-arringtons.html
MediaTemple Logo
QuickSprout Logo
OpenX Logo
Cotendo Logo
Quantcast