last data update: 2011/10/15, 20:04

Website loading time

during the test: 0.91 s

cable connection (average): 1.12 s

DSL connection (average): 1.33 s

modem (average): 12.39 s

HTTP headers

Information about DNS servers

badscience.netMX30mx.badscience.netIN3600
badscience.netA80.87.131.115IN3600
badscience.netSOAns1.yourhostingaccount.comadmin.yourhostingaccount.com200707094910800 3600 604800 3600 IN 3600
badscience.netNSns2.yourhostingaccount.comIN3600
badscience.netNSns1.yourhostingaccount.comIN3600

Received from the first DNS server

Request to the server "badscience.net"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns2.yourhostingaccount.com
DNS Server Address: 65.254.254.155#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 31421
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

REQUEST SECTION:
badscience.net. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
badscience.net. 3600 IN MX 30 mx.badscience.net.
badscience.net. 3600 IN SOA ns1.yourhostingaccount.com. admin.yourhostingaccount.com. 2007070949 10800 3600 604800 3600
badscience.net. 3600 IN NS ns1.yourhostingaccount.com.
badscience.net. 3600 IN A 80.87.131.115
badscience.net. 3600 IN NS ns2.yourhostingaccount.com.

Received 181 bytes from address 65.254.254.155#53 in 2 ms

Received from the second DNS server

Request to the server "badscience.net"
You used the following DNS server:
DNS Name: ns1.yourhostingaccount.com
DNS Server Address: 65.254.254.102#53
DNS server aliases:

HEADER opcode: REQUEST, status: NOERROR, id: 12809
flag: qr aa rd REQUEST: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

REQUEST SECTION:
badscience.net. IN ANY

ANSWER SECTION:
badscience.net. 3600 IN A 80.87.131.115
badscience.net. 3600 IN NS ns2.yourhostingaccount.com.
badscience.net. 3600 IN NS ns1.yourhostingaccount.com.
badscience.net. 3600 IN SOA ns1.yourhostingaccount.com. admin.yourhostingaccount.com. 2007070949 10800 3600 604800 3600
badscience.net. 3600 IN MX 30 mx.badscience.net.

Received 181 bytes from address 65.254.254.102#53 in 2 ms

Subdomains (the first 50)

Typos (misspells)

vadscience.net
nadscience.net
hadscience.net
gadscience.net
bzdscience.net
bsdscience.net
bwdscience.net
bqdscience.net
basscience.net
baxscience.net
bacscience.net
bafscience.net
barscience.net
baescience.net
badacience.net
badzcience.net
badxcience.net
baddcience.net
badecience.net
badwcience.net
badsxience.net
badsvience.net
badsfience.net
badsdience.net
badscuence.net
badscjence.net
badsckence.net
badscoence.net
badsc9ence.net
badsc8ence.net
badsciwnce.net
badscisnce.net
badscidnce.net
badscirnce.net
badsci4nce.net
badsci3nce.net
badsciebce.net
badsciemce.net
badsciejce.net
badsciehce.net
badscienxe.net
badscienve.net
badscienfe.net
badsciende.net
badsciencw.net
badsciencs.net
badsciencd.net
badsciencr.net
badscienc4.net
badscienc3.net
adscience.net
bdscience.net
bascience.net
badcience.net
badsience.net
badscence.net
badscince.net
badsciece.net
badsciene.net
badscienc.net
abdscience.net
bdascience.net
basdcience.net
badcsience.net
badsicence.net
badsceince.net
badscinece.net
badsciecne.net
badscienec.net
bbadscience.net
baadscience.net
baddscience.net
badsscience.net
badsccience.net
badsciience.net
badscieence.net
badsciennce.net
badsciencce.net
badsciencee.net

Location

IP: 80.87.131.115

continent: EU, country: United Kingdom (GBR), city:

Website value

rank in the traffic statistics:

There is not enough data to estimate website value.

Basic information

website build using CSS

code weight: 80.35 KB

text per all code ratio: 19 %

title: Bad Science

description:

keywords: goldacre bad science nutrition nutritionism nutritionists nutritionist media pseudoscience gillian mckeith patrick holford mmr health scare medicine homeopathy homeopaths postmodernism alternative therapy therapies complementary hettie brain gym detox cosmetics evidence based medicine magnets mrsa phd kapferer statistics

encoding: UTF-8

language: en-US

Website code analysis

one word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
(1)40
(2)27
(6)16
(3)15
of11
(4)10
(9)8
(14)6
(20)6
science6
nonsense5
(5)5
with4
(13)4
data4
regulating3
the3
research3
media3
Bad3
Science3
bad3
(10)3
(52)3
academic3
pr3

two word phrases repeated minimum three times

PhraseQuantity
bad science3

three word phrases repeated minimum three times

B tags

U tags

I tags

images

file namealternative text
Powered by Positive
rssfeed

headers

H1

H2

Search

This Great Book

T-shirts

Categories

Posse

What if academics were as dumb as quacks with statistics?

You might also enjoy my second blog… and nerdydaytrips.com

Cherry picking is bad. At least warn us when you do it.

Benford’s Law: using stats to bust an entire nation for naughtiness.

Academic papers are hidden from the public. Here’s some direct action.

Brain imaging studies report more positive findings than their numbers can support. This is fishy.

Sampling error, the unspoken issue behind small number changes in the news

I made a documentary about cohort studies in epidemiology, on BBC Radio 4

I’m talking at Glastonbury, Saturday 1:30pm Free University in The Park! (Also SGP, Latitude…)

There’s something magical about watching patterns emerge from data

Stuff

I love them

The Bad Science Forum

Archives

Meta

H3

Search

This Great Book

T-shirts

Categories

Posse

What if academics were as dumb as quacks with statistics?

You might also enjoy my second blog… and nerdydaytrips.com

Cherry picking is bad. At least warn us when you do it.

Benford’s Law: using stats to bust an entire nation for naughtiness.

Academic papers are hidden from the public. Here’s some direct action.

Brain imaging studies report more positive findings than their numbers can support. This is fishy.

Sampling error, the unspoken issue behind small number changes in the news

I made a documentary about cohort studies in epidemiology, on BBC Radio 4

I’m talking at Glastonbury, Saturday 1:30pm Free University in The Park! (Also SGP, Latitude…)

There’s something magical about watching patterns emerge from data

Stuff

I love them

The Bad Science Forum

Archives

Meta

H4

H5

H6

internal links

addressanchor text
Bad Science
academic pr
academic publishing
adverts
africa
aids
alternative medicine
acupuncture
herbal remedies
homeopathy
nutritionists
anecdotes
annual roundup
aric sigman
authority
bad science
badscience
BANT
big pharma
book
book reviews
brain gym
brainiac
bullying
cash-for-"stories"
celebs
childishness
chocolate
churnalism
climate change
competing interests
conflict of interest
cosmetics
craig sams
crime
dangers
danie krugel
death
denialism
detox
dna
dodgy academic press releases
doing nothing
dore
drurrrgs
duplicate publication
economics
electrosensitivity
equazen
evidence
evidence based policy
evolutionary psychology
fish oil
fraud
fuel pr
geek
genetic nonsense
ghostwriters
gillian mckeith
Global Radio
gm
government reports
great popularisers of science
guest writers
hate mail
heroes
heroes of bad science
Hi-Fi
hiding data
history of quackery
ID
ions
irrationality research
jeni barnett
jonathan leake
journal club
laws
LBC
legal chill
letters
libel
magnets
manufacturing doubt
matthias rath
media
bbc
channel 4
channel five
evening standard
express
guardian
independent
ITV
mail
mirror
news of the world
sun
telegraph
times
media research
medicalisation
methods
MiniBlog
miracles
MMR
models
mondo academico
MRSA
nanniebots
neuro nonsense
neurostuff
new scientist
not bad science
numerical context
onanism
open methods
organic
oxygen
patents
patrick holford
penises
perpetual motion
PhDs, doctors, and qualifications
phone stalking
placebo
podcast
politics
postmodernist bollocks
powerwatch – alasdair philips
pr guff
predictions
presenting numbers
procrastination
pseudodiagnoses
psychic nonsense
psychology of woo
publication bias
qlink
quantum physics
rape
references
regulating media
regulating nonsense
regulating research
religion
retractions
revenge
roger coghill
roland kapferer
roundup
scare stories
schools
science comms
scienciness
screening
secret data
show your working
smears
space
spin
statistics
stifling criticism
structured data
subgroup analysis
suicide
surveillance
survey data
systematic reviews
teaching resources
tobacco
toys
trial registers
uncertainty
utter nonsense
vaccines
very basic science
water
weight loss
whistleblowers
Teek
What if academics were as dumb as quacks with statistics?
methods
neurostuff
statistics
24 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
You might also enjoy my second blog… and nerdydaytrips.com
bad science
No Comments
Read the rest of this entry
Cherry picking is bad. At least warn us when you do it.
academic pr
academic publishing
aric sigman
schools
systematic reviews
6 Comments
this time
Read the rest of this entry
Benford’s Law: using stats to bust an entire nation for naughtiness.
crime
economics
statistics
structured data
8 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
Academic papers are hidden from the public. Here’s some direct action.
academic publishing
bullying
42 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
Brain imaging studies report more positive findings than their numbers can support. This is fishy.
academic publishing
publication bias
regulating research
statistics
19 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
Sampling error, the unspoken issue behind small number changes in the news
bbc
media
statistics
uncertainty
16 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
I made a documentary about cohort studies in epidemiology, on BBC Radio 4
onanism
podcast
8 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
I’m talking at Glastonbury, Saturday 1:30pm Free University in The Park! (Also SGP, Latitude…)
bad science
onanism
5 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
There’s something magical about watching patterns emerge from data
bad science
26 Comments
Read the rest of this entry
About Dr Ben Goldacre
– Upcoming talks
- Twitter
What You Can Find Here
– Audio and Video
– Bad Science Shop
– The Bad Science Forums
The Rules
The Bad Science Forum
Meaningless Banter :: Good practise in teaching...
Meaningless Banter :: Man Of Steel
Meaningless Banter :: Little things that really annoy, even though they shouldn't
Meaningless Banter :: The tiny geeky things that make your day happy
Meaningless Banter :: Non-religious exclamations
Meaningless Banter :: Ducks????
Bad Science :: Good Science - radiation risk in perspective
Meaningless Banter :: Autism/Sensory sensitivity friendly cinema
Meaningless Banter :: Night Shifts
Bad Science :: MMR / Autism - another study
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
February 2003
July 2002
January 2000
January 1007
Register
Log in

external links

addressanchor text
Ambriguous
Amoebic Vodka
Apathy Sketchpad
Apothecary’s Drawer
Architectures of Control :: Design with Intent
Away from the bench
Azimov
B3ta
Bad Homeopathy
BadChemist
BPS RESEARCH DIGEST
BreathSpa
BrokenHut
Butterflies&Wheels
Confessions of an Aca/Fan
Confessions of an Aca/Fan: ”What is Remix Culture?”: An Interview with Total Recut’s Owen Gallagher (Part One)
Denialism
DrAust
EducationWatch
Exclaims
Exploiting the desire for order :: Architectures of Control
Design with Intent
Frontier Psychiatrist
Gaylard
Gimpy
Hawk/Handsaw
Headspace: Dogwatch corner
Healthwatch
Holfordmyths.org
HolfordWatch
Jesus And Mo
LabLit
Language Log
Left Brain Right Brain
Letting Off Steam
Lifehacker
Mike Stanton
Mind Hacks
Ministry of Truth
monochrom
Not Exactly Rocket Science
Orac
PharmaGossip
PoorPothecary
Press Gazette
Prof David Colquhoun’s “Improbable Science”
Pyjamasinbananas
PZ Myers
Quackometer
Quackwatch
Ratbags.com
SciencePunk
Scientific Misconduct Blog
Shpalman
Skeptobot
Spyblog
Spyblog
Steinsky
Teek
The Guardian
Thinking Is Dangerou
Twonilblankblank
Valueaddedwater
War On Error
WFMU Oddmusic
What is Ben reading?
xkcd
a mighty torpedo
my other blog
Aric Sigman
Professor Dorothy Bishop
PDF posted
long Guardian piece on academic publishers
‘Worrying’ jobless rise needs urgent action – Labour
www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b012wg2q/Science_From_Cradle_to_Grave/
HMS Sweet Charity
www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/news/the-free-university-of-glastonbury-returns
Secret Garden Party
Mark Pilkington
Latitude
My Other Blog
All time favourite abstract so far, via @gingerly_onward
Another new property ID code, we need cleaner data...
Great post using Benford's law on accounting data over time
Here is the letter Whipps Cross NHS Hospital sent to staff asking them to work for free
How do you deal with being wrong is very important indeed.
smells of the lamp...
Truly awesome collection of high res old maps of London
The ethics of hustling for free stuff as a journalist
Potential scandal: are people in the NHS selling your private medical information to marketers?
Great stuff from Public Health bods on NHS reforms, unwise DH press statement